The Contrariety Of Two Friends Essay Example For Students

The Contrariety Of Two Friends Essay Everyone has friends. Some are so alike that it is shocking. They seem to walk, talk and even eat the same. But others are so very different that it is an absolute wonder that they can even stand each other, let alone be friends. That is how it is in the friendship of Sandra and Nancy. They differ in everything from their views on cleaning, their views on fun and even in their views on religion. The two girls are the best of friends but they are very different, even in the views on how they clean. Sandra is very neat and tidy. Everything must be in its place at all times. Nancy on the other hand is extremely messy. Wherever things happen to land is where they should belong. Sandra cleans her room at least once a day. While Nancys room is lucky to be cleaned once a month. When Sandra cleans, it is a lengthy procedure. Sometimes she will spend hours just cleaning her room. When Nancy cleans, it is done as quickly as humanly possible. If she can get everything shoved under her bed in fi ve minutes then she is happy. The thought of even sleeping in a messy room makes Sandra extremely uncomfortable. Though Nancy cant stand to be in a spotless room, with out the urge to mess something up. We will write a custom essay on The Contrariety Of Two Friends specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Since the two girls can hardly stand to be in each others rooms, they frequently go out. But even in their choices of a good time, they have severe differences. Sandra is very quiet and shy. She doesnt like to be around a lot of people that she doesnt know. Nancy on the contrary is loud and very outgoing. She loves being with new people and doing new and exciting things. She hates the thought of doing the same thing over and over again. Sandras idea of a great weekend would be to stay at home with a few friends and watch movies. While Nancys fantasy weekend would include mountain climbing, skydiving, or any thing where she met tons of new friends. Sandra is the most shy around boys. In fact, she has never even been on a single date. Nancy is perhaps even more outgoing and brave when in comes to boys. She has been on lots of dates and has had many boyfriends. Even though these two differ in many matters of their life, the most difficult difference to overcome is their difference in re ligious beliefs. The two girls have gone to the same day care and school all of their lives, but they have never been of the same faith. Sandra is a very strong Baptist. In fact her dad is the pastor of the Baptist church. But Nancy is a Catholic, but she isnt very involved in her church. Sandra has been a Baptist since the very day she was born. Nancy did not become a member of the Catholic Church until she was almost fifteen years old. Sandra believes whole-heartedly in her church and in her God. But Nancy questions her religion and the actions of her God. These two girls have been friends for nearly eighteen years despite their many differences. Many people say that opposites attract, and in this case it seems to be true. Perhaps the differences even made their friendship all that much stronger. Words/ Pages : 559 / 24

Machiavelli rhetorical analysis Essay Essay Example

Machiavelli rhetorical analysis Essay Essay Example Machiavelli rhetorical analysis Essay Paper Machiavelli rhetorical analysis Essay Paper Machiavelli was seeking to derive the favour of a local leader by giving him advice. Through the usage of repeat. historical mention. and persuasive apothegms Machiavelli efficaciously conveyed the of import accomplishments required to be a prince. Machiavelli repeated himself legion times throughout the piece. The intent of this was to relay the importance of the advice given. To exemplify this point. Machiavelli says that if a prince wants his people to esteem him. he must â€Å"keep his custodies off the belongings and the adult females of his citizens and his topics. † . in paragraph 15. In paragraph 25. he reiterates the same construct of non being predatory. He says. â€Å"As I have said. what makes him hatreds above all else is being predatory and a supplanter of the belongings and the adult females of his topics ; † . Another illustration. is to non worry about what the multitudes call you. Machiavelli says this multiple times with different adjectives attached. Machiavelli informs the reader that a prince must non worry about being called things such as a miser. cruel or cheap every bit long as it is for the good of the province. By reiterating the construct. Machiavelli shows that if a prince is making what is right as he should. there is no demand to fuss upon names one is called. Machiavelli is really successsful in making his point through repeat. it drilled the thoughts into the heads of the readers. To give his advice construction. Machiavelli used an copiousness of historical mentions. One leader he refers to is Francesco Sforza. Duke of Milan. Sforza fought and won power as a Duke. he passed that power on to his boies. His boies avoided war and lost power. This a great narrative to carry the reader to believe that the advice Machiavelli is giving should be taken. His message is that if a prince is non willing to contend. as Sforza’s boies were non. they excessively may lose power. Machiavelli stresses the point that it is better to be feared than loved. A perfect comparing of the two sides is Hannibal and Scipio. Machiavelli refers to these two leaders because in times of war a prince must non worry about being called cruel. Hannibal was inhumanely barbarous to his soldiers. but it worked. Dissention neer arose because Hannibal was respected and feared. On the contrary. Scipio was overly compassionate. This merely led to Spain arising against him. for they had no military subject. Machiavelli’s usage of historical mentions greatly adds to the receiving and apprehension of the message portrayed in this piece by the readers. Machiavelli uses apothegms to carry the reader into believing that what he is stating is the truth. In support to that statement. Machiavelli says since love and fright can barely be together. if we must take between them. it is far safer to be feared than loved. He goes on to back up his advice by saying that in times of war. your â€Å"friends† will turn away. The manner Machiavelli phrases this sentence followed by his support. leads the reader to believe there is no possible manner he could be lying. Besides. Machiavelli advices that a prince should larn how to populate by concealed fraudulence. for past princes have been successful from cognizing how to pull strings the heads of work forces by being malicious. At the terminal of paragraph 19. he says â€Å"†¦ and in the terminal they have surpassed those who laid their foundations upon candidly. † By using that honestness will go forth you in the dust compared to princes who deceit his topics by looking to maintain his word. Machiavelli accomplishes doing the reader believe his advice is true. Machiavelli conveyed the of import accomplishments of being a leader in The Prince through advice successfully by the usage of repeat. historical mentions. and persuasive apothegms to efficaciously convey his message.

Markan Interpretation of Miracles Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Markan Interpretation of Miracles - Essay Example The setting of the miracles is important and includes the physical environment in which the characters in the gospel lived, as well as, the props that make up the environment. Three settings figure prominently in the gospel of Mark; the wilderness, the sea, and Jerusalem. The sea is important in the gospel of Mark, being referred to forty nine times or brought up directly. There is no other setting is given attention in the gospel of Mark. There is an obvious relationship between the miracles present in the gospel of Mark and the sea and these are stressed in two ways: the placement of references to the sea in the gospel’s first half and the number of miracles happening in the sea. In the story of Mark, the sea is a locale of chaos, destruction, fellowship and instruction (Blackburn 32). In the Markan story events, the two thousand swine and all the demons that possessed them are drowned in the sea. In addition, a dramatic storm in the sea threatens Christ and his disciples wi th destruction. This scene served to demonstrate the faith and dominion of Jesus over evil, as well as reveal the disciples’ lack of faith. At one point, the writer describes Christ as teaching while in a boat. Jesus, in this case, is pictured as a man on the sea. Such images are filled with various possibilities for mediation between the spatial opposites. Such settings in the gospel of Mark cast an unquestionable link between the content of Christ’s parables, as well as his teachings of the kingdom’s in-breaking (Boring 12). The wilderness is encountered in the early parts of the of Mark’s gospel. John the Baptist makes an appearance in the wilderness, then Jesus is driven into the wilderness, and Peter then comes to him in the wilderness. Finally, Christ and his disciples go to the wilderness during a retreat, where the multitude follows them. In the opening chapter, mark points the audience towards the wilderness, four times, which bears importance fr om a symbolic or mythical standpoint. The Jewish scriptures offer two interpretations of the wilderness: a place of divine providence and divine testing, as well as a place containing prophesied transformation in the messianic age (Telford 40). The two aspects are linked into the Markan scheme. The wilderness threatens Yahweh’s people very existence, but also greatly illuminates God’s readiness and power to dispel the threat. There is evidence that the story of the wilderness carries a dual significance. The wilderness at times is threatening and hostile while, at other times it turns into a place of preparation. The wilderness is the locale for the testing of the disciples, as well as, a demonstration of God’s power in Christ. God’s provision of bread is made more dramatic in the gospel, by the harsh nature of the wilderness and can be associated with the incident during which Yahweh provided manna to the Israelites in the desert. Such emphasis on the se tting argues for the view that there is a deeper and parabolic meaning to the miracles performed in the desert (Telford 43). Jerusalem, just like the wilderness and the sea, provides a key setting for the narrative of Mark to take place. Jerusalem in the gospel is representative of the geo-political space within which the gospel can be interpreted. While reading the gospel of mark, the reader becomes gradually aware of the final destination of Christ is Jerusalem. In the gospel of Mar

Usability Testing and Implementation (HW) Research Paper

Usability Testing and Implementation (HW) - Research Paper Example These three players co-exist for good site usability. John Rhodes’ (2005) point about usability training over testing is promising for companies who have been depending and investing too much on usability tests, more so, for those companies which choose to neglect usability. He had a matter-of-factly statement that instead of hiring usability professionals which may cost them $35, 000 half a day, a company may rather invest in training designers and developers about the whole usability aspect. Usability is not just an aspect of selling a site but a series of operations (Rhodes, 2005). From there, designers and developers may be able to integrate the knowledge gained from the training into the course and duration in structuring and designing a site (Rhodes, 2005). However, this train of thought actually eliminates the importance of usability researches needed for the usability in huge user-centered interface designs where average people are the end-users. More so, he Usability tests may be equally important to usability training. The former involves users. The latter involves creators. Dumas and Redish (1999) summed up five attributes to which all usability tests have in common: 1.) the aim to enhance of product usability; 2.) participation of end-users; 3.) involvement of actual tasks; 4.) evaluation of what participants do and say; 4.) analysis of data and diagnosis of the problems; and 5.) recommendation to fix problems. In short, they offer how significant a user’s opinion may be in formulating an extensive solution. This though, doesn’t hand over the benefit of usability training, where it makes jobs easier and fast for creators. Designers and developers, themselves, for instance could conduct user testing which is a basic usability activity. This is also a good utilization of what they learned from their usability training. With small-time projects, the

Analyse the critical HR actions multinational corporations should take Essay - 1

Analyse the critical HR actions multinational corporations should take to facilitate expatriate adjustment - Essay Example 47) Black and Gregerson (1991) have described expatriate adjustment to foreign assignments as â€Å"the degree of psychological comfort with various aspects of a host country,† (p. 463). This has led to many of the domestic employees being exported into exotic locations and countries with diverse cultures and economic systems. Similarly, local companies lacking appropriate expertise and human resources are increasingly seeking expatriates to operate their expansive production units as well as provide training to the domestic workforce. Experienced labourers in saturated markets also seek employment abroad as they lack employment opportunities within their domestic locations or crave for better remuneration that accompanies foreign assignments (Swarts and Plessis, 2007). Foreign assignments and postings generally prompt exuberant excitement from those employees chosen to undertake such tasks as the prospect of career advancement, finance increments and other benefits beckon. However, these feelings of career windfall quickly wane once they get to the actual locations. The probable causes of the trauma are ‘cultural shock, language barriers, and severance from the relatives’ will ultimately impinge on the work, efficiency and expenses to the organisation. The expatriates’ agitation means that they either adjust to the locality conditions or abscond from the assignment and return to their home countries (Koteswari and Bhattacharya, 2007). The dysfunctional cost of stress in overseas postings may lead to detrimental consequences like, skiving, drunkenness and drug addiction, high turnovers, untimely exit, internal and external antagonism, nonattendance, among others. A study by the University of Pretoria (2008) on expatriate turnovers in foreign postings, principally on their attitude to the jobs revealed that ‘organisational commitment and job

All My Sons as a Tragedy

All My Sons as a Tragedy All My Sons is an American play, set in a typical, suburban town in the backyard of a family home. The Kellers are a family who live a life of tension and un-realistic aspirations after losing a son at war. As the Kellers try to live a normal life they are left struggling when they are left to face dealing with the consequences of their actions these lead to the central tragedies of the play. Chris Keller is an honourable man, a man who tries to see the good in people, a man of war. His father, Joe Keller is a chief character who is about three things: Business, money and making a profit. However, Joe Keller is a family man above all else, and has sacrificed everything, including his honour. Nonetheless, he must face up to what he has done and with these actions he must step forward into an inevitable future. Throughout the play the character introduce familiar faces, hard situations, memories both bitter and sweet, the first example of this is the morning after the thunderstorm, the Kellers awaken to their memorial tree, has been torn down (which was planted in memory of Larry after he was lost at war). This gives the Keller family a rude awakening that Larry is probably gone forever; this is a tragic realisation for most of the Kellers. Obviously the main tragedies in this play include the horrendous crime that Joe Keller committed, killing many pilots which included the unfortunate murder of his son. This is a realisation that soon occurs to Keller which unavoidably leads to his Suicide. In regardless of Joe Keller being such a family man, he had caused such deceit not only to his family and to him self, but people all around him. He had caused too much deceit and hurt that he could no longer deal with blood left on his hands. Regardless of these actions, Joe Keller was once a poor man, a poor man with a big dream. And in some ways he is a fine example of what conquering the American Dream stands for. Yet, when he reached to the top his money obsession continued. He ultimately became power hungry, a man fixated and possessed by the mere thought of money and business. He became a man who murdered dozens and a man who took advantage by using the death and destruction of the war as an excuse for making more money. The only question is was he really making it for his family, or was he just making it for himself? This is something that his son, Chris would by no means would or even think about doing, I Didnt want to take any of it Chris Keller is a man who would never take money, let alone blood money from anyone. Chris is just a simple guy that believes that greed can destroy lives, and in his fathers case, it did exactly that. Joe and Chris Keller may be father and son; nevertheless they are still particularly diverse from each other. Chris is an optimistic man, he is a romantic and idealistic. Everything in Chriss mind is wonderful and faultless. His father on the other hand is a practical man. He is sensible and thinks only about the important things in life e.g. money and his family. As protagonists and father and son they are inescapably much alike and this leads to tension and confrontation. Both the Keller men both have short tempers; this is a quality that brings anger and constant anxiety and strain to the play. Chris has always looked up to his father, he always saw him as the sole provider, the protector and the hero in his life. In Chriss eyes Joe Keller fought against the court of law, to prove his innocence. However and unknowingly, when behind the shadows of all this, lingers deceit when family friend Steve Deever is sent to prison for tragic crime he did not commit, he was sent to prison for something Joe Keller did. In many ways, I think Joe Keller is in denial about the situation. I believe he fought so hard to try and prove his pretend innocence that he almost convinced himself and wife Kate that he did nothing wrong and that he is innocent. I believe that he lied in the way he did due to his fear of people finding out the truth, especially Chris and also because he was frightened to lose all his power. If Chris was to discover the truth Keller would no longer be able to live with him self. The idea of killing one son and losing another was almost never an option Keller wouldnt even have contemplated on doing. Because he spent so long building his business empire he was terrified to lose not only that. But the love and respect from his only other son. Chris and Joes relationship in all means ended up deteriorated and this some ways is the central tragedy, a father who loses two sons because of his own mistakes and greed. Thats what a war does. I had two sons, now I got one. It changed all the tallies. In my day when you had sons it was an honour. This quote is ironic, the way Keller says Thats what war does he seems to be so in denial that he seems to be blaming the war, when he is the reason his son dies. Joes character mentions only having one son left, but even Chris begins to drift away from his father; Sometimes you infuriate me, you know that? à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ You have such a talent for ignoring things. Chris seems to have unknowingly stunned Keller by saying this, the word ignore implies that Keller is fully aware of what exactly has been going on and he is ignoring his past as if nothing had even happened in the first place. The relationship between Chris and his father seems to allow the audience to understand how the two of these characters think and interact not only with each other but other characters in the play also. Joe Keller is a man who believes he owes nothing to anyone other than himself and family, however as Chris served in the war he believes in a superior responsibility to humanity, he likes to help people, make people feel good about themselves. This illustrates the completely parallel characteristics that Keller and Chris have. The relationship Joe and Chris Keller share is diverse throughout, as father and son they joke and butt heads from time to time. But as Chris discovers the dark past his father has hidden, he is in utter shell shock. Not only has this man killed dozens of pilots, he killed his own son and left an innocent man rotting in a jail cell. As this tragic truth began to sink into Chriss mind and no matter what Keller had to say for himself, to Chris this no longer matters. Its not enough to be sorry. I think because Keller was such a businessman, that Chris in some ways felt that his fathers job seemed almost more important to him than Chris, but Chris was still a priority. So when Chris found that that his brother was murdered by his own father for business, this was the final straw. The cats in that alley are practical; the bums who ran away when we were fighting were practical. . . But now Im practical, and I spit on myself. Im going away. Im going now. Everyday three of four men never come back and he sits back there doing business. . . This quote suggests quite clearly that Chris is disgusted at the fact that all those men died because of his father and it seems utterly insane that Keller was able to sit back and continue to run his business as everyday men were dying because of his father. To conclude, Chris and Joe Kellers relationship contribute to the central tragedies of the play in a massive way. It proves that just because two people are related and share the same blood, does not mean they are compatible. And asks the question, do we really know our family? Chris spent years look up to his hero of a father, however towards the end of the play Chriss utter disappointment, aversion and almost hatred for Keller becomes apparent. This consequently leads to Kellers revelation, Then what is this if it isnt telling me Sure, he was my son. But I think to him they were all my sons. And I guess they were, I guess they were. This then leads to the final tragedy of the play, Kellers abrupt suicide.

Lysistrata and the Peloponesian War Essay -- essays papers

Lysistrata and the Peloponesian War Many comedies of this time period explore issues that were of importance to those people. Lysistrata is no different. It explores issues relevant to the time period in which it was written. Aristophanes uses the Peloponnesian War to illustrate the differences between the men and women of the time period. As Lysistrata begins, the women are gathering for their meeting with Lysistrata. They gripe and complain about how late the others are for the meeting, while Lysistrata begins to clue them in on her plan. Once all have arrived who will be arriving, she gives them the details of her plan to stop the war. That plan being that they with hold sexual favors from their husbands or lovers until the war is over. For the most part, only one other woman, Lampito, is in agreement with her. The others cannot fathom doing such a thing. After all, they cannot go without sexual pleasures, could they? Eventually, Lysistrata and Lampito convince the others to go along with the plan. Finally, the women who did not give up and go home manage to seize the acropolis. The elders and magistrates try their best to smoke the women out, but to no avail. The women dump water on the men and stand their ground. Eventually the men of both sides had enough of being denied sexual pleasures and came together to si gn the treaty. They were reluctant at first, but they gave way to the women’s wishes and signed the treaty ending the war between Athens and Sparta. The references to the war in the text are actually quite blatant. The war is openly referred to during the course of the story. The women do what they do because they are sick of their men being gone at war. The women did not like the idea at first. They ... ...superior to the women, and that the women believe themselves to be subservient to men. The Peloponnesian War was important in Lysistrata in that it enabled Aristophanes to have a context within which to describe the attitudes and personalities of men and women of this time period. People are not always as they seem. The men of Athens and Sparta knew their women were bothers at home, but they found out that their actions at home were nothing compared to what could happen when a whole group got together and decided to accomplish something. Lysistrata show’s us all the value of working together as a team to accomplish a goal. As it was put by Magill Book Reviews, â€Å"LYSISTRATA is high comedy, as popular and timely today as it was when it was written. The humor is broad and bawdy. Like much good comedy, the play holds up to ridicule contemporary conditions and situations.†